Utopian Society: Pipe-Dream or Possibility?

This room is for pic or comments that might offend other & younger viewers. Making fun of companys or people is allowed as long as it not a member of this community. ENTER ROOM AT OWN RISK!!!! You have been warned.

Moderators: MrVulcan, thunderchero

Locked

24th century society will be based on:

Trek Style Society
8
44%
Capitalist model
5
28%
Socialist/Communist model
2
11%
None - Human extinction
3
17%
 
Total votes: 18

Numbazix
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 872
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Utopian Society: Pipe-Dream or Possibility?

Post by Numbazix » Sun Dec 21, 2003 11:25 pm

The Trekian model of society 24th century style: My own attitude on this varies based on 21st century news reports, however what this society may or not be is a question I'll put to all of you. Is this vision a pipe-dream or is it possible?

:?: :?: :?:
Zix
Master of all I survey--wheres my glasses?

Guest

Post by Guest » Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:46 am

It is impossible, since no-ones idea of perfection are the same as anyone elses, so we'd disagree on how to make this utopian society, thus it wouldn't be perfect for all, so its hardly utopian is it?

Squire James

CenturionV
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Post by CenturionV » Mon Dec 22, 2003 7:43 am

I agree. Its impossible to get a "utopian" society, I think though, through unity of belief it would be possible to get a very very good society were things like crime, war, disease and the hundreds of other problems that plague current nations would be reduced to an absolute minimum
"Oh, now be honest, Captain. Warrior to warrior. You do prefer it this way, don't you, as it was meant to be. No peace in our time. "Once more unto the breach, dear friends."

User avatar
DarkGoblin
Cadet 2nd Year
Cadet 2nd Year
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 3:00 am

Post by DarkGoblin » Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:56 am

Society in Star Trek is far, <i>far</i> from perfect. It's idealized, certainly, but it's not perfect. Just look at Section 31, all the corrupt admirals and officers (Leyton, Dougherty, Cartwright, Pressman, Ben Finney, Matthew Decker, etc.), Dr. Bashir's father (an unsuccessful man)... The list goes on and on.

The real question is -- does it really matter whether it's possible or not? If it's "impossible" does that mean we should stop trying? For that matter, how do we know that it's impossible until we try? (Of course, one might also argue that nothing can truly be proven to be impossible just because you can't do it. But this is the same argument as saying that God does/doesn't exist because you can/can't prove that He exists, and I don't think we need to get into <i>that</i>.)

Personally, I've stopped thinking about these things altogether. If we allow ourselves to get bogged down in complex issues that likely don't even have answers, we're not going to get anywhere. Leave it to the philosophers.
It's a faaaake!

Numbazix
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 872
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Complex issues...

Post by Numbazix » Mon Dec 22, 2003 2:28 pm

Einstein believed that the more complex an issue was that the answer was at the opposite end of the spectrum: Simple. If one was to try and establish this type of society it would be impossible without considering the complex issues. The opposite it also true: Simple issues often requiire complex solutions.

Philosopher? Maybe I am. I much prefer the term explorer. You can't get somewhere without asking for directions at times. :lol:

It would appear you haven't stopped thinking about complex issues. I like your answer.
Zix
Master of all I survey--wheres my glasses?

User avatar
captain_henk
Cadet 1st Year
Cadet 1st Year
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Dronten Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Complex issues...

Post by captain_henk » Mon Dec 22, 2003 4:04 pm

Numbazix wrote:Einstein believed ... Simple issues often require complex solutions.
The theory for an Utopia is rather simple:
Love thy neighbour (and good medical sciences, too. But this is the groundwork)
But it's SO much more difficult in real-life. :(
[b]I've got God above me,
Jesus beside me.
The holy ghost in me.
Why should i have to fear?[/b]
[img]http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/83882/0.jpg[/img]
My forum: 21154.rapidforum

User avatar
cecilzero1
Past Administrator
Past Administrator
Posts: 2226
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 2:00 am
Location: from the Dark Side of the moon
Contact:

Post by cecilzero1 » Thu Jan 15, 2004 7:41 pm

there will never be a Utopia at the way things are going :( hate,racism,bitterness ect.....
Image

Twitch
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 2:00 am
Location: L.A. CA USA

Post by Twitch » Fri Jan 16, 2004 1:17 am

Yeah Cecilzero especially when a radical bunch of islamics rationalize that it is a realistic goal to ruin all western societies and return the world to 1,000 AD when they were hot. So stupid it doesn't warrent comment.

And hey this Star Trek society stuff is the product of a few collaborating writers for an imaginary TV series. I'm a writer. Would you want to believe my predictions of how I say ithe future should be? I don't think so. :)

User avatar
fetalmonkey
Lieutenant-Junior Grade
Lieutenant-Junior Grade
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:00 am
Location: where ever i can be
Contact:

Post by fetalmonkey » Sun May 01, 2005 7:31 am

utopia is a dream and this isnt disney world we live in. dreams dont come true here

Draconia
Cadet 4th Year
Cadet 4th Year
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 2:00 am
Location: Neverland.

Post by Draconia » Mon May 16, 2005 9:19 pm

It seems to me that we might end up living on a planet ruled by the United States.
I am the Dragon Queen of the Azure Skies. My graceful flight inspires awe in all who see it.

User avatar
Elrond
Past Administrator
Past Administrator
Posts: 2629
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 2:00 am

Post by Elrond » Mon May 16, 2005 9:47 pm

Wow, I thought this topic had been dead. I appreciate you guys' interest in posting in the forums; however, it may be time for this thread to stay dead, at least for now. :)

Look at the last date of the one who posted before you two folks:

2004-01-16, 01:17:19.

Wow, that's three months before I even registered. 8O

Now on topic, I think that even the Star Trek timeline wasn't a utopia because of all the wars there are. In my experience, most people who live here in the US can't get along with anybody else. Fortunately, there are people like those on this site who get along well and we've known each other either for months or years on this site. But in regular every-day life, for two people to get along for more than two seconds is rare. I'm not too surprised that there's so much war. Granted, what's going on now isn't even close to what WW2 was, but war will no doubt always continue.

In the Star Trek timeline, Zeframe Cochrane invented warp drive, then poverty disease and war on earth was (pretty much) eliminated. But as we saw, there was a Terra Prime, Section 31, other races that wanted to take the Federation down, corrupt Admirals and conspiracies. The Federation is sometimes at war with itself.

My point is, that Star Trek is a rather optimistic view on the future, yet war still exists among humanity in some form or another. No matter how good we think we can make it, someone (terrorists) is going to come along and ruin it.

Since the 300's, the world has been in the Dark Ages. To me, the Dark Ages never truly ended. The Crusades, the Medieval wars, the cruel punishments (some which happen today in many corners of the world), are still continuing. The only thing that changes is technology. The Muslims and Christians have been at each-others' necks for quite a long time.

First, you have those who wish to punish one culture because of their differences. Then, the people who are attacked or their allies must defend themselves - so they also go to war. Then the terrorists will loose, then they'll get angry in the future, or if we lose, we get angry in the future and then the cycle of war begins again.

No utopia is possible, I imagine. Except with the Borg. I'd hate to say it, because the Borg are the most lethal and deadly forms of life (well, until the Sernaix and Universal Conquerers), but the Borg have a Utopia, of sorts. Because there is a collective mind and no personal differences, thus no war due to differences. The Borg rarely if ever fight each other.

So if we were to have a utopia, we would have to, all of us, lose our individuality as a price for peace. To me, it wouldn't be worth it. I'd hate to say it, but the wars we have fought have given us the technologies we now have. If it was all peace and no problems, then we wouldn't have anything to be interested in.

And even if there were no wars but we would still have problems in life, that would be the closest to utopia we would get to. If we didn't have problems (such as the classLabel problems in modding Armada), then there wouldn't ever be alternate and different ways to do things. If you want to eliminate something bad, then you have to sacrifice something good - that's the order of the universe that can't be breeched it seems.


Last word on this topic: Thread Closed (due to being very old and thusly revived) until further notice.
Last edited by Elrond on Mon May 16, 2005 10:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Dead

User avatar
JPKTrekker
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Nirai Kanai
Contact:

Post by JPKTrekker » Mon May 16, 2005 10:00 pm

You made some good points, Elrond. Who would ever want to give up their free will and individuality? Plus, it is triumphing over adversity that makes life worth living.

EDIT: by Elrond: Thank you there. Very true. I just locked this thread until later notice, as it was very old and was revived. :wink:
"Until Hell calls my name!"
Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests