Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:03 pm
by RSE_Chris
Personally I'm not up for playing any mods other than UDM.
As for vanilla, I'm always up for that. 102 would be a nice classic to play again, but real bug fixes are nice too (like the registry Dissy mentions).
I do much prefer the old war tournament way of deciding settings; it's fairer, and adds variety. Not to mention it's more fun!
UDM, 102 or 103 are fine with me.
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:54 pm
by severenth
I think while UDM is being ironed out, lets have some old skool 1.0.2
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:21 pm
by mickar
Please, no so called 'fixes' to 1.02.
And with all due respect, cloaked kling vs rom at t5 is not balanced. Rom stands a chance on small map but not on med/lrg. There was a reason why we said 't5 med no klings'.
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:05 pm
by ruthlessferengi
overall, i am up for either previous version of UDM or a vanilla tourney, so let's have it scheduled...
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:08 pm
by carcher
i agree with ruthless , udm or vanilla, lets go for it
just dont draw me against the "ruthlesscardie" again please
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:11 pm
by Pigman
Happy with UDM or Vanilla. There's plenty of good UDM versions we can go with while thunderchero perfects UDM even more.
I'm equally happy with Vanilla and share sentiments about so-called bug fixes, some of which were at best features and at least gave you more tactical options.
I know I'd get ripped apart in proper Vanilla 1.02 by some of you old-timers (BTW I'm 49 tomorrow!!), but what the heck, that's what got us all started and would be great fun.
Regards
Pigman
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:47 am
by severenth
1.0.2 or 1.0.3 seems to be the vote
I think for fairness, 1.0.3 could be better, considering it being a tournament, we need as few bugs as possible
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:16 pm
by RSE_Chris
After playing 102 some more lately, I'd forgotton how good it is without any changes.
My vote goes to 102.