Personally I'm not up for playing any mods other than UDM.
As for vanilla, I'm always up for that. 102 would be a nice classic to play again, but real bug fixes are nice too (like the registry Dissy mentions).
I do much prefer the old war tournament way of deciding settings; it's fairer, and adds variety. Not to mention it's more fun!
UDM, 102 or 103 are fine with me.
Tournament 4 - 2009...what shall we do boys and girls???
Moderator: thunderchero
-
- Lieutenant-Commander
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
-
- UDMIII tournament winner
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: Surrey, BC Canada
-
- Multiple Tournament Champion
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: GMT- 5
-
- Commander
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: England uk
-
- Commander
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: Devon, England
Happy with UDM or Vanilla. There's plenty of good UDM versions we can go with while thunderchero perfects UDM even more.
I'm equally happy with Vanilla and share sentiments about so-called bug fixes, some of which were at best features and at least gave you more tactical options.
I know I'd get ripped apart in proper Vanilla 1.02 by some of you old-timers (BTW I'm 49 tomorrow!!), but what the heck, that's what got us all started and would be great fun.
Regards
Pigman
I'm equally happy with Vanilla and share sentiments about so-called bug fixes, some of which were at best features and at least gave you more tactical options.
I know I'd get ripped apart in proper Vanilla 1.02 by some of you old-timers (BTW I'm 49 tomorrow!!), but what the heck, that's what got us all started and would be great fun.
Regards
Pigman
-
- Lieutenant-Commander
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
-
- Commander
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:00 am
- Location: England, UK